Malthusian Relativityι**=7/3ψ
Population dynamics - the evolutionary extension

Population limitation

Selection by interactive competition explains the Damuth allometry and a green world

The fact that the densities of animals are limited to the degree that the world is green is evidence for a natural selection limitation that is driven primarily by interference competition instead of exploitation. Exploitative competition is usually generating constant relative fitnesses with r and k selection for a continued increase in abundance (Charlesworth, 1994; Witting, 2000, 2002).

A second piece of evidence is the Damuth allometry on abundance (Damuth, 1981, 1987). Although this allometry tends to vary somewhat with the scale of observation (Nee et al., 1991), the exponent is usually around -0.75 across terrestrial species (Damuth, 1981, 1987; Peters, 1983; Nee et al., 1991) on scales where effects from inter-specific interactions are negligible (as assumed in the allometric deduction). And the exponent has been found to declined from -0.79 to -0.86 across species with two and three dimensional behaviour (Pawar et al.,2012); in close agreement with a predicted change from -0.75 to -0.83 (Witting, 1995, 2016).

A third piece of evidence comes from life history studies across gradients of differential survival. Here it is usually found that populations with increased mortality evolve smaller body masses and an increased rate of reproduction (e.g., Reznick et al., 1996; Haugen and Vøllestad, 2001; Sinclair et al., 2002; Coltman et al., 2003; Carlson et al., 2007; Herczeg et al., 2009; Rossetto et al., 2012). When the mortality rate is increased and the abundance is initially declining, there is counter-balancing selection in action, where energy is reallocated from mass to replication with a compensatory increase in the abundance and level of interactive competition.

References

  • Carlson, S.M., E.Edeline, A.L. Vollestad, T.O. Haugen, I.J. Winfield, J.M. Fletcher, J.BenJames and N.C. Stenseth 2007. Four decades of opposing natural and human-induced artificial selection acting on Windermere pike ( Esox lucius). Ecology Letters 10:512--521.
  • Charlesworth, B. 1994. Evolution in age-structured populations. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Coltman, D.W., P.O'donoghue, J.T. Jorgenson, J.T. Hogg, C.Strobeck and M.Festa-Bianchet 2003. Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426:655--658.
  • Damuth, J. 1981. Population density and body size in mammals. Nature 290:699--700.
  • Damuth, J. 1987. Interspecific allometry of population density in mammals and other animals: the independence of body mass and population energy-use. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 31:193--246.
  • llestad, 2001Haugen:Vollestad:2001Haugen, T.O., and L.A. Vøllestad 2001. A century of life-history evolution in grayling. Genetica 112:475--491.
  • Herczeg, G., A.Gonda and J.Merila 2009. Evolution of gigantism in nine-spined sticklebacks. Evolution 63:3190--3200.
  • Nee, S., A.F. Read, J.J.D. Greenwood and P.H. Harvey 1991. The relationship between abundance and body size in British birds. Nature 351:312--313.
  • Pawar, S., A.I. Dell and V.M. Savage 2012. Dimensionality of consumer search space drives trophic interaction strengths. Nature 486:485--489.
  • Peters, R.H. 1983. The ecological implication of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Reznick, D.N., I.M.J. Butler, F.H. Rodd and P.Ross 1996. Life-history evolution in guppies ( Poecilia reticulata) 6. Differential mortality as a mechanism for natural selection. Evolution 50:1651--1660.
  • Rossetto, M., G.DeLeo, D.Bevacqua and F.Micheli 2012. Allometric scaling of mortality rates with body mass in abalones. Oecologia 168:989--996.
  • Sinclair, A.F., D.P. Swain and J.M. Hanson 2002. Disentangling the effects of size-selective mortality, density, and temperature on length-at-age. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:372--382.
  • Witting, L. 1995. The body mass allometries as evolutionarily determined by the foraging of mobile organisms. Journal of Theoretical Biology 177:129--137.
  • Witting, L. 2000. Interference competition set limits to the fundamental theorem of natural selection. Acta Biotheoretica 48:107--120.
  • Witting, L. 2002. Two contrasting interpretations of Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection. Comments on Theoretical Biology 7:1--10.
  • Witting, L. 2016. The natural selection of metabolism and mass selects allometric transitions from prokaryotes to mammals. bioRxiv http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/084624.